Four hundred thousand garment and shoe
workers in Cambodia organized a strike on December
24 for a wage increase. The strike was led
by a coalition of unions. It began with 200 workers
who protested in front of government offices
where union leaders and government representatives
discussed the price of the work to which the
workers will continue to be subjected.
In Cambodia seven hundred thousand workers,
90% of them women, labor for western brands
like GAP, Adidas, Nike, and Puma. They also
produce for big stores like Kmart and Target,
among others.
The minimum wage in Cambodia is $80 a
month. The workers are asking for an increase to
$160 per month. The government has only proposed
an increase to $100.
Garment manufacturing represented a profit of
$5.1 billion for the companies in the first 11
months of 2013, according to the Cambodian
Minister of Commerce, 22% more than in 2012.
For the current government of Prime Minister
Hun Sen, the union of the garment workers in
struggle and the national Party of Rescue of Cambodia
(electoral opposition party) are a challenge,
but for the workers they are a trap.
And now, as the legacy of the socialist movements,
the union organizations lead us to the
slaughter and propose to the workers that an increase
in the minimum wage is the only solution to
their situation of poverty and wage slavery.
Last year, Cambodian garment workers carried
out 131 labor reform strikes. This is also not the
solution. We know that with a wage increase
comes an increase in the price of everything we
consume, reversing the wage increase,
creating a capitalist vicious
cycle in which we workers always
lose. Our goal must be the destruction
of capitalism once and for all.
The workers in Cambodia have
been among the most militant fighters
in Asia. After World War II, millions
of them confronted their exploitative
government and the profits of the
French imperialist bosses and then the
US bosses during the Vietnam War.
From 1965 to 1973, the US imperialists
dropped 1.9 million tons of bombs on Cambodia,
which was supporting the Vietnamese
nationalists in their struggle against the US.
Today, in this epoch of sharp inter-imperialist
struggle, the Cambodian capitalists are fighting
like caged dogs to determine who can exploit the
workers more and get more profits for their imperialist
cronies.
Workers Everywhere Have Same Enemy,
Same Fight
The conditions in the sweatshops in El Salvador,
in Bangladesh and in Los Angeles are the
same as in Cambodia. We have a common
enemy, capitalism, which exploits us and keeps
us enslaved to a machine and a wage so that the
owners of these machines enrich themselves and
live off our work.
A garment worker in Los Angeles commented:
"A few weeks ago we did not have work; we
worked two days a week and had to look for work
in another factory. Once some 10,000 pieces
came from the company Lucky but there wasn't
anybody to do the work. We garment workers are
important, but the bosses treat us like garbage and
throw us away when they don't need us anymore."
In Los Angeles, thousands of workers do not
receive the minimum wage of $8 an hour, since
they are paid by the piece. This seems to workers
in other places to be a lot of money, but the reality
is that to survive and pay monthly rent of $1,000
or more, several families have to live together.
We workers do not have to follow the bosses'
game and their unions tied to economic reforms.
We do not accept the electoral parties in Cambodia,
or the fmln in El Salvador or Lopez Obrador
in Mexico, or Obama in the US. We workers need
to build our own International Communist Workers'
Party, ICWP.
We propose that workers worldwide join the
Party to be able to organize millions to take
power and to build a communist society, where
there will no longer exist bosses or money or exploitation.
Pol Pot Regime Was Never Communist
Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge (KR) brutally ruled
Cambodia from 1975-79. Since then, Pol Pot has
been a poster child for anti-communism. But Pol
Pot was no communist.
Saloth Sar (later Pol Pot) came from a
landowning family closely tied to the King. As a
student in Paris after WWII he joined the French
Communist Party, an electoral, trade-unionist
party that supported nationalists in former French
colonies like Cambodia.
Sar returned to Cambodia in 1953, seeking alliances
among southeast Asian nationalist movements.
In 1963, he became the leader of a tiny
party which rejected Marxism, declaring peasants
(not workers and soldiers) the key revolutionary
force.
In 1968, Sar took the very anti-communist step of
isolating himself in a private compound with personal
guards, setting himself above his comrades.
A 1970 US-backed coup installed Lon Nol as
Cambodia's military dictator and supported him
with an invasion of 20,000 US and south Vietnamese
troops. Soon, two million people (out of
seven million) were homeless, and rice production
dropped by over 80%.
The Khmer Rouge started growing rapidly. Its
leaders limited new membership to poor peasants,
although they themselves were mostly from student
or middle-peasant backgrounds. Real communists
welcome the masses into the Party. We
struggle to build communist working-class understanding,
developing all members into leaders.
The 1972 KR Land Reform policy aimed to
create equally–sized private plots. Their 1973
policy turned peasant villages into cooperatives
that owned property jointly. Both policies were
essentially small-capitalist.
Neither top-down reorganization mobilized
rural workers for communism. Further, a ban on
individual possessions (not just the means of production)
ridiculously caricatured communism,
considering the precious few items that most people
owned.
At the same time, the KR exposed its antiworking
class character by attacking cultural minorities
like the Chams, attacks which soon
extended to all Cambodians. Such racism is a hallmark
of capitalism's "divide and rule" strategy.
Meanwhile, the KR supplemented its aid from
China with profits extracted from forced labor on
rubber plantations.
In mid-1973, the KR controlled two-thirds of
Cambodia and half its population. It besieged the
capital, Phnom Penh.
When the Chams rebelled, the KR responded
like true capitalists by crushing the uprising and
building more jails in which rebels were tortured.
When the KR took power in 1975, it evacuated
all urban workers to the countryside and forced
them into slave labor in the "killing fields." Its
policy was to "eliminate money," but it had foreign
trade, calculated state expenditures in US$,
and bought food in Thailand for its cadre with
$100 bills.
US imperialists collaborated with their new
Chinese allies in backing Sar, now calling himself
Pol Pot. Carter's national security advisor Zbigniew
Brzezinski explained: "I encouraged the
Chinese to support Pol Pot... Pol Pot was an
abomination. We could never support him, but
China could."
US, European, and Chinese imperialists continued
to "recognize" the Khmer Rouge throughout
the 1980s, long after it lost real power.
Pol Pot a communist? No way!
|