An Important Criticism and More Letters

Important Criticism of the last issue here ♩ End Imperialist Wars with Communist Revolution here ♩ Stop Gaza Genocide here ♩ Hurricane-A Capitalist Disaster here ♩ Letter About Barbie here ♩

Important Criticism of Last Issue

Our collective in Delhi, India discussed the articles in Vol. 14 #14.  In India, we print a shorter version of Red Flag, which is usually the first three pages. We thought the letter on page three, by a Los Angeles teacher, needed an editorial comment.

The author of the letter had an opportunity to explain the ruling class propaganda of ‘both sides are to blame’ and ‘Israel was only responding’. The author never once said there was a genocide happening in Gaza.

You can only explain genocide if you understand history. The writer could have explained the historical emergence of colonialism, Zionism, ultra racism in the Israeli ruling class. This has resulted in mass expulsions, brutal wars after wars for domination, deliberate attacks on the civilian populations in Gaza and the West Bank, that have been going on for a long time.

Instead, the author’s assertion of building unity between Israeli and Palestinian workers is not going to convince many people. It is mechanical, ahistorical. In India, we are bombarded with anti-Muslim/anti-Dalit hate propaganda by the fascist BJP. We make a breakthrough in recruitment by ideologically struggling with the masses by looking deeper at the colonial history that created the social class of Hindu and Muslim.

—Delhi collective in the struggle

Red Flag responds:  Thank you.  We agree that the letter was mechanical and ahistorical.  It should not have been on page three, and we should have commented on it critically.

End Imperialist Wars, Fight for a Communist Revolution.

“I feel completely frustrated and helpless about the indiscriminate attacks on humanity, hostage taking, forced displacement, bombings, a complete genocide. Is this war worth it?” commented J.

“An artificial state founded by British imperialists with the excuse of early 20th century Zionism, to defend British and US imperialist interests in the Middle East is leading to the bloodiest genocide of the 21st century,” J concluded.

“No, none of this has to do with the Jewish people, none of it has to do with the Muslim faithful. They are just people stripped of their dignity, of their lives, so that a few politicians can hold power for a while longer,” said R.

The problem is Zionism, which is a racist ultra-nationalist ideology that defends the superiority of Jews over Arabs. Israel’s defense minister demonstrated this when he spoke of Palestinians as animals. This is the policy promoted by Netanyahu’s fascist government. This ultra-right-winger even blamed the Nazi genocide not on Hitler, but on the Arabs!

It is a crucial time to fight and mobilize the masses for a communist system, to reverse the genocide in Gaza.

“What difference would it make to this war if we made a communist revolution?” J asked.

The difference is great. That is an imperialist war. Our struggle is for freedom, to materialize our ideals of a common good. To live collectively without wage slavery, without exploitation, sexism or racism, a life without borders, to defeat and end capitalism.

We need a red army to mobilize the masses where young communist soldiers and the working class give leadership for a communist society.

We must spread the ideas of real communism among our working-class brothers and sisters around the world to stop the plans of the imperialist bosses.

Join and be part of our party. It is urgent to build a mass ICWP. Help us strengthen the revolutionary movement we need. Read and distribute Red Flag.

—Comrade in El Salvador

Stop Gaza Genocide!

PASADENA (USA), November 13 — “Stop Gaza genocide! Cease-fire now!” Hundreds of adults and children gather weekly outside the office of Rep. Judy Chu.  Marching across a busy street, they disrupt traffic. Their chants fill the air.

This grass-roots action is growing rapidly.   And the political struggle sharpens.  “Judy Chu, you can’t hide – stop supporting genocide,” youths chanted.  A leader of Jewish Voice for Peace rushed to shut them up: “You can’t say that, you’ll push her away.”  Typical of how liberals try to cage protests within capitalist politics! Another marcher, a union organizer, intervened: “You can’t tell the young people what to say!”

Meanwhile a Muslim friend told a comrade, “I don’t like ‘from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.’” She sees that a Hamas-controlled Palestinian state would likely resemble today’s Iran —and drive out Jewish people.

Comrades and Red Flag readers are raising communist ideas in these protests, reconnecting with old friends, and making new ones.  Our party collective will get stronger.

Hurricanes: Not Natural Disasters, But Capitalist Disasters

The death toll, misery, and precariousness left by Hurricane Otis in Acapulco, Coyuca de BenĂ­tez, and the entire coast of Guerrero are caused by the capitalist system.

The government did not take measures to prevent the damage to people and their property. It has been said that it ignored warnings that the tropical storm would become a highly dangerous hurricane.

Poverty and rudimentary or improvised housing caused the hurricane to affect the working class the most.

The wealth from the area’s tourist industry remains in the hands of the capitalists. Few workers have sufficient income to buy or build resistant houses.

These “natural disasters” fit perfectly into the rulers’ plans. The population doesn’t blame them for the natural phenomena, and they are not burdened with the responsibility of reconstruction. So any help is accepted as a benefit, and the politicians see their influence strengthened.

Additionally, they can enrich themselves with the management of supplies. Either they directly divert the official budget, or they make arrangements with suppliers.

President LĂłpez Obrador said that he met with the Mexican bishops to coordinate the aid before going to San Francisco (USA) to participate in the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation Forum (APEC).

The Zambrano family owns the Cemex corporation. It also has a cement production plant in Israel, helping to build the walls separating Gaza and the West Bank from Israel. It has announced that “its labor union” will take a caravan of trucks with materials for reconstruction. This is “part of an inter-institutional effort” in conjunction with private initiative and other social organizations.

The working class, as always, was the first to respond to help those in need. Workers brought food and medicine and helped search for the injured under the rubble. Only the working class saves the working class!

Capitalism is the problem. The solution is to end it, to abolish all buying and selling. First, the buying and selling of labor power. Then we would not need money. Production would be to satisfy present and future human needs. To achieve that we need to mobilize the masses for communism.

—Comrade in Mexico

Where “Barbie” Gets It Wrong:  Childcare, Consumerism, and Body Image

I liked that the movie review of Barbie invited us into conversation about capitalist gender roles and communist alternatives.

The review describes how a giant Barbie doll disrupts girls’ play with baby dolls and pretend-housework. The movie’s point was that “Barbie ushered in a new world of possibilities for women beyond the limits of motherhood and domesticity.”

I think we should be much more critical of that.

For starters, over one third of US women already worked outside the home in 1959, when Barbie debuted. Fifty percent of Black women did.

Children’s play (in many societies) prepares them for adult work.  Taking care of babies is important, useful work.  So is housework.  The problem isn’t that girls’ play prepares them for this.  It’s that boys’ play doesn’t.

Dolls designed for boys (“action figures”) prepare them to fight without questioning why.  At worst, “cowboys and Indians” invite them to reenact genocide.

It’s a problem if girls get only dolls and kitchen sets to play with. They need construction toys, art supplies, sports equipment, and much more.  But what “new possibilities” did Barbie represent?  Mainly consumerism, as the review notes, especially for clothing.  “Let’s go shopping,” said Talking Barbie.    Shopping became the new “women’s work.”

Barbie overwhelmed little girls with a distorted image of a grown woman.  If Barbie were life-sized, she would be 5’9″ tall with a 39″ bust, an 18″ waist, 33″ hips, and size 3 shoes.  An actual woman that height would probably wear at least a size 9 shoe.

Barbie’s feet are deformed to permanently wear high heels. Her hands are tiny.  How could she do real work?  All the “career” and “athlete” Barbies are just the same bizarre teen model dressed in Halloween costumes.

Barbie supposedly weighs 110 lbs. A healthy woman that height would weigh at least 145 lbs. Is it coincidental that anorexia spiked in the 1960s as Barbie’s popularity soared?  That’s when images of the “ideal” female body changed from full-figured (like Marilyn Monroe) to skeletal (like Twiggy).

Studies of hunter-gatherer societies show that children make dolls and learn, through play, to nurture younger children.  They also make and use other objects in play and to accomplish actual tasks.  Most are full-sized or miniature versions of adult tools.  They are learning useful skills for adult roles. In play, they also learn their peer culture.

Children in communist society will probably play more like hunter-gatherer children than like kids in late-stage capitalism.  Work will again become the center of culture.  Children, like everyone else, will do whatever useful work they can.  “Child labor” will be valued, not exploited.  And yes, that will often include boys as well as girls helping with younger children.

—Comrade in Los Angeles (USA

Read Our Pamphlet:

The Communist Fight Against Sexism

Front page of this issue