Only Communist Workersâ Power Will Resolve Capitalismâs Contradictions
School workers in âMarch for Our Livesâ
CALIFORNIA (USA) â âYouâre in math and youâre a communist!â exclaimed a youngish part-time faculty union officer, eagerly taking leaflets and a copy of Red Flag. âAt my school,â he continued, âall the communists teach English.â
This teacher was more open to communist ideas than most other delegates at the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) convention. However, hundreds took ICWP (International Communist Workersâ Party) leaflets and dozens took Red Flag. Hundreds more leaflets â over 500 in all â and more papers were distributed at the Orange County youth-led âMarch for Our Livesâ that most convention delegates attended.
The conventionâs main theme was the upcoming Supreme Court âJanusâ decision. That ruling is expected to end the right of public-worker unions to collect âagency feesâ from non-members they represent. This is part of a long-term Republican plan to weaken the union movement and, with it, the Democratic Party.
Unions are scrambling to respond. CFT leaders at this convention, as always, praised and promoted politicians they consider allies.  But this year they focused, too, on organizing. They emphasized that the CFT existed for fifty years without bargaining rights or agency fees. It can again. But militant unionism is not what workers need.
Outside the âLeftâ and âRightâ of Capitalist Politics
With the West Virginia wildcat school strike safely over, union officials are now using it as an example of the power of militant unionism.  The CFT is even sponsoring a bill to make May Day a state holiday celebrating working-class struggle.
Some radicals may describe this as an example of how unions can be âmoved to the left.â And they can â if ârightâ and âleftâ are correctly understood as a continuum within bourgeois democracy (a capitalist political system). Thatâs what it was originally: in the 1789 French assembly, royalists sat on the right and capitalist representatives on the left.
Workers need to understand politics differently: as a class struggle for power. The ICWP is not a âleftâ party that functions within the bossesâ system. We are a communist party that organizes to destroy that system and build an entirely new one.
The capitalist class uses its state power â including racist terror â to protect its continuing ability to profit from exploiting us. It recruits our youth to fight in its armies to defend one nationâs capitalist-imperialist bosses against their rivals.
Communist workersâ power, in contrast, will mobilize masses to end exploitation and, with it, racism, money, profits and deadly imperialist wars.
Work in Communist Society
Some think that communists who lead militant fights for reforms are showing the way to communist revolution. We disagree. Many historical examples, from all over the world, make this point. But hereâs one from the recent CFT convention.
A big issue for many delegates was whether California should keep limitations on how many classes part-time faculty can teach at one college. Many argued (successfully) that the CFT should work to reduce or eliminate these restrictions. They pointed to the hardships faced by teachers who have to travel from school to school because they arenât allowed to get enough work at any one to survive. However, others noted, this could encourage administrators to hire fewer full-time teachers, since part-timers cost less.
Other workers, like bus operators, face similar issues.
A comrade delegate said, in several conversations, that this debate showed how the wage system itself divides the working class.  It creates contradictions between individual workersâ needs and those of our class.
It will be very different, the comrade said, in a communist society. Work will be organized by workers ourselves to meet everyoneâs needs without money or exchange. We will work as much (or as little) as we want. Few people will do any one kind of work âfull-time.â Instead, most of us will do many different kinds of work. No longer will individual needs conflict with collective needs.
Reformism and trade-unionism are dead-ends, not a road to communist revolution. But many people on those roads, like others in single-issue mass marches, are looking for something different.
That âsomethingâ is open mass mobilization for communism. We need to find more ways to build long-term ties with those who will, maybe sooner than we think, join us.
 USA, April 2âInspired by the recent West Virginia school strike, teachers walked out in Kentucky (above) and Oklahoma.